|
Coming Soon: How to Avoid Visitation Disputes David Slepkow is a partner concentrating in Rhode Island (RI), divorce, family law, domestic relations, child custody, child support, visitation, restraining orders and out of state family law issues. He is a member of the bar in both Rhode Island and Massachusetts. In practice since 1997, David prides himself on being able to adapt to a particular client's desires. He is aware that some clients want to work out an amicable settlement with a spouse while other clients want aggressive legal representation. A "one-size fits all" strategy will not work in family law. A family law lawyer must be adept at helping clients in both highly contentious litigated matters and amicable out of court settlements. Our firm balances these interests and makes every effort to accommodate out of state clients who are unable to come to Rhode Island for client meetings. Please review the frequently asked questions about Rhode Island Child Support and Post Divorce Do's and Don'ts prepared by David Slepkow. This firm provides services in the following areas of family law: - divorce (non-contested and contested)
- child support contempt proceedings
- child support modification and termination
- property settlement agreements
- adoptions
- divorce and family law mediation
- visitation disputes
- interstate child support, visitation and custody matters
- child custody
- alimony
- restraining orders/domestic violence/no contact orders
- criminal matters relating to family law
- out of state relocation
- father's rights
- out of state child support and family law issues
- paternity
- grandparents visitation
- enforcement of final judgment and court orders/contempt motions
- real estate issues concerning divorce and family law
- equitable division of assets
- drafting and negotiating prenuptial agreements and property settlement agreements
- motions to terminate, modify or increase child support
Free initial consultation . Reasonable and affordable rates. Weekend and evening appointments available. All major credit cards accepted. Flat rate nominal non-contested divorces offered. Please email David Slepkow with your family law inquiry. We at Slepkow, Slepkow & Associates also have five other lawyers to assist you in your real estate, business and corporate law, probate law and zoning law legal needs.
Article prepared by Attorney David Slepkow, 1481 Wampanoag Trail, East Providence, RI, 401-437-1100, Contact Attorney David Slepkow. Here is an excellent article by a Florida Family Law Attorney which is mostly applicable in Rhode Island Visitation cases. Please note that in Rhode Island a substantial change in circumstances is required to modify a visitation agreement. In parenthesis, I have noted the difference between Florida Family Law and Rhode Island Family Law. Visitation Agreements - A Critical Part Of The Divorce Process By Kim Byrd Visitation is often the most contentious issue divorced parents have to deal with on an ongoing basis. Issues concerning visitation are rarely black-and-white and often require flexibility as circumstances change. Visitation can also be the only remaining control mechanism divorced parents have over each other. Creating a detailed visitation agreement, as part of the divorce process, can help prevent years of stressful encounters and prove beneficial to both parents and their children. Florida's family law courts believe that it is usually in the child's best interest for both parents to have frequent, unhampered and meaningful access to their children. A visitation agreement made by both parents is preferable to a court-imposed solution. However, if parents are unable to agree on visitation, courts frequently order visitation according to commonly used or established guidelines. The details of those guidelines are extensive and beyond the scope of this article. A critical theme throughout those guidelines is fairness to both parents. It is helpful to keep this theme in mind when negotiating your own visitation agreement. Family law courts are "courts of equity." Historically, courts of equity based their decisions on fairness, given the case's unique set of circumstances, rather than written law. Today, there is a great deal of written law to cover almost any family law matter that might arise. However, courts still strive to establish reasonable terms that are fair to both parents when determining issues of visitation. In determining reasonable visitation, a court will give due regard to many factors, including: the age of the children involved, their educational commitments, health and social factors, business commitments of the parents and the geographical distances between the parents. All of these factors can and will change over time. Therefore, a detailed visitation agreement is simply a good starting point for what may well be a decades-long process requiring both flexibility and a commitment to fairness. There are three main areas that must be addressed when creating a visitation agreement: Visitation Schedule - A visitation schedule should anticipate what time of day visitation will begin and end. Further, the schedule should specify on which days of the week and what weeks of the year visitation will occur. What Holidays will the children spend with each parent? Will those Holiday visits alternate from year to year? Visitation on special days such as Birthdays, Mother's Day and Father's Day should be clearly spelled out. Exchange - Parents often forget to specify in their agreement how the children will be exchanged. While it is a imperative to set out when and where the exchange will occur in the visitation agreement, it is also important to discuss the assumptions on which the exchange agreement is based it is based. Planning for adjustments, as the situation changes over the coming years, is also strongly advisable. Again, flexibility and fairness are essential. If parents live a distance from each other or relocate after the dissolution of marriage, the method of exchange can quickly become a point of great contention. A commonly used visitation schedule requires that the children be picked up and dropped off at the home of the primary residential parent. This is because it is frequently the home that was occupied by both parents when they were still married. It may not be fair in all situations, however, that the secondary residential parent be responsible for both picking up and dropping off the children at the home of the primary residential parent. For instance, job schedules may make it difficult for one parent to pick up or drop off the children in a timely manner. Weekend plans may call for an adjustment to the regular pick up and drop off routine. If the primary residential parent moves further away they should be willing to share the responsibility of transporting the children for pick up or drop off. Communication - It is vital to agree to a method of communication regarding all issues that concern the children, including visitation. If a parent won't be able to meet their obligation, as determined by the agreed upon schedule, how will they notify the other parent in a way that minimizes the impact of the unmet obligation? How much advanced notice should be given if a visit must be canceled? Will third parties be involved in the communication process? Certainly the method of communication should avoid the use of the children as messengers as much as possible. Of course, parents can agree between themselves to modify the visitation agreement as life's circumstances change and individual needs develop. Such modification can be informal, on an as-needed basis, or it can be formalized by petitioning the court if there has been a substantial change in circumstances. If the parties cannot agree to a modification of the visitation agreement and the court is asked to settle the dispute, a great deal of weight will be given to the agreement reached during the divorce process. Once the terms of visitation are specified in the divorce decree, it can be extremely difficult to convince the court to change those terms. You often must prove that the children's welfare is being detrimentally affected by the existing agreement. (In Rhode Island A subtsantial Change in Circumstances must be shown to change an agreement and the Court will look at the best interests of the Children.) Proving such a detrimental impact can be both difficult and costly. ( Detrimental impact is not relevant to Rhode island Visitation)Therefore, the terms of visitation agreed upon during the divorce process are frequently the terms that remain in affect throughout the child's upbringing. (It Sounds like it is somewhat easier to change visitation in Rhode Island then Florida. However keep in mind that the judge will carefully look at the prior visitation arrangement in determining a new visitation schedule.) Divorced parents should remember the court's belief that it is in the child's best interest for both parents to have frequent, unhampered and meaningful access to their children. Fairness and thoroughness in adopting a visitation agreement and fairness and flexibility in applying the agreement will ensure that the child's best interests continue to be served. O. Kim Byrd, Esq. Byrd Legal Counsel, PA http://www.KimByrd.com Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Kim_Byrd http://EzineArticles.com/?Visitation-Agreements---A-Critical-Part-Of-The-Divorce-Process&id=909132
|